Research integrity for peer review

The integrity check reviewers don't have time for

SciScore screens every submitted methods section against MDAR, ARRIVE and CONSORT in about 20 seconds. It flags missing RRIDs, blinding, randomisation, power analysis and problematic cell lines, so editors see a rigor signal before peer review begins.

Used by AACR, AHA Journals, APS and Rockefeller University Press Integrated with Editorial Manager and eJournalPress 2026 APE Award for Innovation 2022 Vesalius Innovation Award
Trusted by journals, preprint servers and publishing platforms
AACR AHA Journals APS bioRxiv and medRxiv Rockefeller University Press Editorial Manager eJournalPress
Where SciScore fits

Most integrity tools check the wrong part of the paper.

Plagiarism checks look at text. Image tools look at figures. Paper-mill detection looks at patterns. None of them check whether the methods can be reproduced. SciScore does, at submission, where the problem can still be fixed.

1

Study planning

Transparency before research starts

Registrations, SPIRIT
2

Submission: SciScore

Methods, rigor and resources checked before peer review

MDAR · ARRIVE · CONSORT · RRIDs
3

Peer review checks

Editorial integrity, but not methods transparency

Plagiarism, image, paper-mill tools
4

Post-publication

Problems found after the fact

PubPeer, Retraction Watch
55+

Trained algorithms check what reviewers skip

Blinding, randomisation, power analysis, sex as a biological variable, inclusion/exclusion criteria and ethics statements.

RRID

Every research resource verified

Antibodies, cell lines, organisms and software checked against their identifiers, with warnings for problematic resources.

3-in-1

The right guideline, detected automatically

Human research → CONSORT. Animal research → ARRIVE. Everything else → MDAR.

~20 s

No change to your workflow

Runs inside Editorial Manager and eJournalPress. Authors get specific fixes; editors get an instant rigor signal.

✕
Can't be sweet-talked

Hidden instructions don't work on SciScore.

SciScore doesn't take instructions from the manuscript: it only detects whether the methods are actually reported. Want a better score? Add your reagent details and address the rigor criteria.

Who it's for

Built for journals. Useful for every author.

For journals and publishers

Enforce the checklists you already require

Enforce MDAR, ARRIVE and CONSORT consistently, without adding reviewer workload.

  • Triage faster with an at-a-glance report cover page
  • Fewer revision rounds on reporting issues
  • A visible commitment to research integrity
Book a demo →
Pilot it on your own manuscripts Sign in with ORCID for a first run, then contact us about testing a batch of real submissions. Start with ORCID → Request pilot credits →
For authors

Check your methods before you submit

Get a score, an MDAR/STAR table and concrete suggestions in under a minute.

  • Core, MDAR, STAR and ARRIVE reports
  • Actionable suggestions
  • Private: only you see your score
Check my manuscript You'll sign in via our partner Aseda Sciences.
Evidence

Validated, published and recognised

iScience · 2020

The Rigor and Transparency Index

Rigor measured across the biomedical literature, with no relationship to journal impact factor.

JMIR · 2022

Institutional rigor scores with the RTI

Large-scale analysis of reporting quality across research institutions.

APE · 2026

Award for Innovation in Scholarly Communication

Recognition for work advancing research integrity and reproducibility.

FAQ

Questions editors ask first

Is SciScore an AI peer reviewer?
No. SciScore doesn't judge whether the science is right. It checks whether the methods are reported well enough to be reproduced and verified, and flags what's missing. Editors and reviewers stay in charge.
How does SciScore fit with other integrity tools?
It complements them. Plagiarism, image and paper-mill tools check text and figures; SciScore checks methods and research resources.
Can authors game SciScore with hidden prompts?
SciScore doesn't follow instructions in the text it checks; it detects whether rigor criteria and research resources are actually reported.
Does it change our peer review workflow?
No. It can run inside Editorial Manager and eJournalPress, providing authors with feedback and editors with a summary.
What will I receive after I submit my methods section?
SciScore returns three reports, downloadable together as a .zip file, and a score between 1 and 10. Learn about SciScore reports.
What is MDAR?
MDAR (Materials, Design, Analysis, and Reporting) is a multidisciplinary framework that helps increase reporting transparency in life science manuscripts. Learn about the MDAR report.

See all questions →

For your submissions

See SciScore on your own manuscripts

We'll run a sample of your recent submissions and walk you through the results.

Book a publisher demo →
Journal Intelligence Dashboard

See how your journals compare

Rigor and transparency metrics for nearly 5,000 journals, 2015–2025. Benchmark journals and explore reporting trends.

Explore the dashboard → Based on the PubMed Central open-access subset.
Contact

Get in touch with the SciScore team

Have a question about SciScore, reports, integrations or your account? Send us a message and our team will get back to you.

SciScore support